Senate to vote on Obamafs jobs bill
By Rosalind S. Helderman, Tuesday, October 11, 2011
President Obama has used virtually every public
appearance in recent weeks to demand an immediate congressional vote on his
jobs plan.
On Tuesday evening, hefll get it, as the Democratic-controlled Senate plans
to hold a procedural vote on whether to allow the $447 million
American Jobs Act to move forward.
But the vote, which could be the only one Congress will hold on the package
as a whole, might do as much to put Democratic senators on the spot as it will
to highlight the Republican obstructionism that Obama has blamed for blocking
consideration of the package.
There is little mystery about the votefs outcome. Democrats hold 53 seats in
the Senate, not enough to overcome unified GOP opposition and muster the 60
votes necessary to break a filibuster and send the package forward.
Even if all Democrats vote for it. And all Democrats are unlikely to back it.
Eyeing Obamafs
dipping popularity and a mixed reception in polls for the jobs package,
several Democratic senators from swing states have shied away from embracing
it.
Obamafs demand for a vote has put senators facing difficult reelection bids
next year in a tough position: Vote for a bill that is probably headed for
defeat, and they will be painted by opponents as too closely aligned with Obama.
But vote with Republicans against it, and they will undermine Obamafs claim that
congressional Republicans have been the obstacle to his attempts to improve the
economy.
That is likely to be a dynamic that will prove problematic for Obama and
Senate leaders in coming months.
Democratic leaders will spend Tuesday urging wavering senators that it is in
their interest to vote gyes,h and aides say they are confident that most of
their caucus will back the plan.
The package includes spending for school construction and transportation
infrastructure; payroll tax cuts for workers and small businesses; and tax
credits for businesses that hire veterans.
Last week, Democratic leaders in the Senate revised the bill to try to make
it more palatable to their members — and a more potent political tool against
Republicans who oppose it.
Instead of paying for the package by ending government subsidies to the oil
and gas industry and limiting tax deductions for those making more than $250,000
a year, as Obama had proposed, they suggested a 5.6 percent surtax on
millionaires.
With the revision, Senate leaders think the bill presents a sharper choice:
Support spending on education, transportation and veterans, or protect the
interests of the very wealthy.
gRepublicans will be hard-pressed to explain why theyfd allow teachers and
firefighters to be laid off rather than have millionaires and billionaires pay
their fair share,h Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said last week.
The changes helped bring some hesitant Democrats into the fold. Sen. Mary
Landrieu, who represents Louisiana and its offshore oil industry, called
the new way to pay for the bill ga key step in the right directionh and said she
was eager to move it forward.
Sen. Robert P. Casey Jr. (D-Pa.), who will face a tough reelection battle
next year and had said he thinks Congress should consider Obamafs plan in
pieces, said late last week that the millionairesf tax is a gfar better
approachh to pay for the ideas.
gNow that wefre in the fiscal crisis that wefre in and the jobs crisis wefre
in, we have to take action to create jobs,h he said. gThis proposal is one way
to effectuate the priority of creating jobs.h
But a number of other Democrats have said they oppose the plan or declined to
indicate how they will vote.
Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) told a newspaper in his home state that he fears
cutting the payroll tax could hurt Social Security, which is paid for from the
tax. And he said he thinks that offering businesses a tax credit to hire the
long-term unemployed, as Obama has proposed, is not the best way to create
jobs.
gThere are things I like in this proposal, but they are outweighed by the
things I just canft accept right now,h he told
Lee newspapers.
The Democratic hesitancy has allowed Republicans to pin the planfs likely
defeat on Obamafs allies.
In the weekly Republican
address Saturday, Sen. John Thune (S.D.) said that Obamafs plan is gso
flawed that Senate Democrats have rejected it and are rewriting it, not to grow
jobs, but to improve their political standing.h
gItfs nothing but a rehash of the same failed ideas hefs already tried,
combined with a huge tax increase,h he said.
The president has been largely silent about murmurings of discontent in his
party.
Instead, in appearances at schools and factories in eight states, he has
trained his rhetorical firepower on Republicans in Congress, including House
leaders who have refused to schedule a vote on the package.
gIf the Republicans in Congress think they have a better plan for creating
jobs right now, they should prove it,h Obama said Saturday in his weekly video
address.
On Monday, he sent supporters a
tweet about the Senatefs vote: gMake sure your Republican legislator knows
you support it.h
© The Washington Post Company